The Novi Information Network
   By the People, for the People, since 1998

 

 Front Page
 News
 Opinions
 Sports
 Business
 Columns

 
 Features
  
About Novi
  
Business Directory
  
Community
  
Government
  
Images of Novi
  
Inside Novi High
  
Job Listings
  
Lansing Connection
  
Local Links
  
Off the Cuff
  
Profile Novi Bios
  
Restaurants
  
Roads
  
Schools

  
Speaking of Sports
 
 Website
 
About Us
 
Advertise
 
Contact Us
 
Donate
 
Help Wanted
 
Privacy Policy

 

Opinions

The Tribune of the People


Quality service, locally owned and operated

 

The People's Editorial

A fiscally conservative budget is approved
April 26, 2008

As Michigan’s economy continues to weather troubled times, it is exciting to note that Novi’s annual budget talks finished ahead of schedule, with near unanimous agreement. The result appears to be a fiscally sound and conservative budget that all should be very pleased with.

The $32.6 million budget proposed for 2008-2009, down $1.5 million from the previous year’s budget, continues to focus on core services while holding the line on staff positions and expenses. The proposed budget takes a fiscally conservative approach, increasing the city’s rainy day fund from 8-12% to 18%, an all-time high for Novi. The city has also increased contributions to retirement funds, which are now believed to be covering expected future needs, and has included sorely needed funds for “Welcome to Novi” signs.

Even though revenues from the state and from local property taxes have dipped in the past couple years, Novi continues to be a fiscally sound, well managed city that is providing citizens with the basic services expected from local government in a quality manner.

Starting with goal setting, and continuing through the City Manager’s proposal and Council’s discussions, this was a planning and budget season that all in Novi should be proud of.

We the People are pleased that our good Mayor, City Council and City Administration worked so well together to agree upon what appears to be an excellent financial plan for the coming year. This continues to be one of the best, if not the best, team ever assembled to manage our fine city, and the results show.

Well done and thank you to all involved in the planning and budget process.

 

p.s. – We thought it odd, but not that unusual, that Council Member Andrew Mutch – a stanch supporter of the Fuerst Farm property preservation - was against moving funds toward that venue and instead suggested those funds be used for roads. Mutch continues to be the lone obstructionist who can’t seem to agree with anyone on anything, and seems to simply look for reasons to disagree with the majority time and time again.
 


Other Recent Editorials:
04/09 A part of Novi's history has 90 days
03/30 Dangerous at any speed
03/16 Sunshine week
03/02 Of recalls, and partisan politics in Novi
02/13 Give the kids the recognition they deserve
01/31 Novi goes about its business

More Editorials

 

Guest Opinion

Road Commission provides best service possible with funding available
By Eric S. Wilson, County Road Commissioner
April 27, 2008

Unfortunately, when it comes to funding, we at the Road Commission for Oakland County (RCOC) are not very sanguine. This past winter took a tremendous financial toll on RCOC, further eroding an already tight budget battered by declining revenues. Despite this financial one-two punch, we will continue to get the critical work done. But make no mistake: Our level of service will be reduced.

The 2007/2008 winter was our most expensive on record, and our state road funding continues to decline. The total cost of keeping the roads clear during the winter, including plowing, salting and grading, was $12.04 million. The next most expensive winter in recent memory was 2004/2005, which cost RCOC $9.42 million.

At the same time, the two main sources of road funding in Michigan, the state-collected gas tax and vehicle registration (license plate) fee, were both down for the first five months of fiscal year 2008 (October through February). Gas tax revenues were down 2.4 percent statewide, while vehicle registration fee revenues were down 2.7 percent. State-collected road funds were down 1.5 percent in fiscal year 2007 as well after being essentially flat for the preceding eight years. RCOC receives no revenues from property taxes and relies almost exclusively on the gas tax and vehicle registration fees for its operating expenses.

Given the sharp increase in winter maintenance costs and the decline in funding, as well as skyrocketing costs in virtually all the materials needed to maintain roads (from fuel and asphalt to steel for sign posts and guardrails), RCOC must cut $2 million from its current budget, though this number could be higher if funding continues to come in below projections.

Cuts have already been made, and others are expected. We have improved efficiency and productivity and reduced costs wherever possible. We currently have 18 vacant positions that we can’t afford to fill. It’s clear that we’ll need a further reduction in workforce by Sept. 30 – the end of our budget year – to balance our fiscal year 2008 budget. Hopefully we’ll be able to reach the needed workforce reduction through attrition, as employees retire.

The impact of the reduced staff is particularly dramatic when you consider that RCOC, prior to these 18 positions being vacated, had only four more positions than we had in 1974. We have maintained a lean workforce.

We have already reduced road work due to our financial shortfall, such as asphalt resurfacing and concrete repairs to eliminate potholes. Unfortunately, the impact of this can be seen in the number of potholes we are experiencing this year. Now, with a reduced workforce, we will be forced to provide a lower level of winter maintenance next winter and less other routine road maintenance from now on.

In the face our deteriorating infrastructure, I’m often asked why the Road Commission doesn’t build roads to last longer. The reality is that the roads we build today are lasting longer than the roads we built in the past. In fact, we’ve dramatically improved our design standard over the last 20 years. The real problem is we simply can’t reconstruct enough of the many roads that have outlived their design life.

Often, those asking this question will also ask why the Road Commission doesn’t build roads to last for 50 years as they do in Europe. The answer to this question is simple: funding. The average gas tax in Europe is between $4 and $5 per gallon. Michigan charges 19 cents per gallon in gas tax. We could rebuild an awful lot of roads with the revenue from $4 in gas tax!

The bottom line is we must operate within the resources available to us. Those resources have been inadequate for years and have been declining for the last 18 months. Michigan has ranked in the bottom 10 states in the nation in per capita state and local spending on roads for more than 40 years, and it shows.

The truth is, we in Michigan don’t pay as much as residents of many other states to maintain our roads. In other words, you get what you pay for.

Other recent columns:
Require a super majority vote for tax increases
Is International Baccalaureate good for Novi Students?
Oakland County Tax Dollars for Cobo Hall?


Due to low volume and the number of fraudulent letters we receive, we no longer print letters here. Instead, we offer citizens of Novi the unique opportunity to write guest editorials.

Please email the editor with your contact information, subject and a photo if you'd like, and we'd be glad to consider running your guest editorial here.

Novi.org reserves the right to accept or reject any guest editorial, and all writers must be verified as living or working in Novi before their guest editorial is printed here. Guest editorials should reasonably fit in the space provided on this page. Guest editorials run for at least 3 days. Click here to voice your opinion.