|
MEGA 101 –
Do Incentives Work?
August 21, 2006
Last week, Novi
City Council was presented with an opportunity to attract a
significant new business to the area. That business, Ryder System,
Inc., is a company that uses leading-edge enterprise transportation
management technologies, distribution management solutions, JIT
processes, sound business processes, world-class logistics personnel
and a rapidly growing market share to maximize customer service and
value while minimizing transportation management costs”.
Ryder is looking to
establish a Regional office to consolidate operations. The new
operation would combine offices in Ann Arbor and Farmington Hills to
a single campus providing 500-800 high tech jobs. Representatives
from Ryder spoke briefly during the meeting and expressed the need
to have a MEGA grant (SBT Tax Credit) to make the Regional office to
happen in Novi. City Council made a $450K commitment to fund road
construction to fulfill the requirement of a local match in order
for the state to consider MEGA tax credits.
The balance of this
article will review the basics of Economic Development & MEGA.
Economic Development & MEGA 101
In recent decades,
the age-old economic competition among the United States has turned
into an economic battle for specific companies and jobs. It is a
skirmish fought with targeted tax incentives, such as abatements in
property or business taxes, offered to firms seen by government
officials as particularly desirable for their ability to create jobs
and stimulate broader economic growth.
Kenneth Thomas, a
University of Missouri-St. Louis political scientist, estimates that
the cost of U.S. state and local incentives provided to corporations
every year is $48.8 billion in 1996 dollars1 (though his figure
excludes incentives offered in Kentucky, due to a dearth of data).
Thomas is not the only scholar to tally a figure of this magnitude.
University of Iowa economists Peter S. Fisher and Alan H. Peters
believe the annual value of state and local incentives distributed
in pursuit of “economic development” exceeds $50 billion.
The Michigan
Economic Growth Authority is
Michigan’s
primary tax incentive program. Established by former Gov. John
Engler and the Michigan Legislature in the hope of fostering state
job growth by encouraging specific out-of-state businesses to
relocate to Michigan and specific Michigan businesses to expand
here, the program’s 11th birthday is April 18, 2006.
MEGA’s agreements
with targeted businesses require a contribution to the overall MEGA
incentive package from the local government or local economic
development unit in the area hosting the new or expanded business
facility. These local business incentives usually take the form of
tax abatements on real or personal property, though they sometimes
include such items as permit waivers, road improvements (the form
Novi elected) and even discounted access to the local municipal golf
course for the business’s employees.
Companies that seek state Single Business Tax credits must apply to
the state-sponsored Michigan Economic Growth Authority and explain
why they may choose not to locate or expand in
Michigan.
The chart below summarizes the reasons companies have listed in MEGA
applications filed between April 1995 (MEGA’s inception) and
December 2005.
Does MEGA work as a job creation tool? The jury
is out and may never return. It could be argued, as it is by many
leading economists, that in order to attract and retain industry,
state government should concentrate on creating an environment that
produces the specialized infrastructure and human capital that will
make it unreasonable for firms to even think about locating in
another state. Good infrastructure, a highly skilled labor force,
and a reasonable business climate will retain high-wage, high-skill
jobs in a state and countervail lowball subsidy packages from states
that have to buy jobs. Other states' project-specific incentives
will not overcome the disincentives associated with a poor business
climate or an unstable tax environment; nor will they do so in
Michigan.
One
thing is for certain. Using tax incentives for new business
attraction is risky business for state and local governments. There
is not a person on Novi City Council that does not want Ryder to
relocate to Novi, however, they agreed unanimously that the local
commitment was not going to be in the form of a tax abatement or any
other reduction in tax revenue. The decision on whether to offer
tax incentives to Ryder now stands with the by the politically
appointed MEGA Board.
Applications for
credits over $1 million are processed by the board have 60 days to
approve or deny the application. The MEGA Board has discretion to
negotiate a tax credit percentage lower than 10 percent of the
eligible investment costs. In practice, credits over $1 million are
subject to less certainty and are more difficult to obtain than
credits at or below $1 million. Hard to say how the MEGA Board will
decide. It is an election year and jobs are a currency of election
campaigns for incumbents.
One
final question to ponder: Should government be in the business of
picking the winners and losers in the private sector?
It has been
quite a long time since Novi received a check from the Federal
government for drug forfeiture funds. As been evidenced by
several opinion letters on this website, this will be a volatile
debate. It does appear that there is less resistance to a gun
range than the location.
As I returned from
a weekend at Cedar Point, I passed the Jeep Assembly plant in Toledo
and was amazed at the number of vehicles sitting in various parking
lots along I-75. As I drove further North towards Detroit, I was
also stuck by how rare it was to see a full car carrier driving
Southbound.
________________________________________________________________
During the past
several weeks, I have been doing a great deal of reading on Economic
Development and Tax Incentives. There has been a great deal written
on both sides of the argument and some of it high contradictory.
A 1996 study
written for the
Mackinac
Center for Public Policy
entitled “MEGA Industrial Policy:
An Analysis of the
Proposed Michigan Economic Growth Authority” highlighted the
problems projected to characterize MEGA.
1.
Targeted tax credits have no significant impact on job creation;
2.
MEGA
would discriminate against small businesses, retail businesses, and
capital intensive businesses;
3.
MEGA
would allow certain firms to be favored over their in-state
competitors;
4.
General tax and regulatory reforms are already working;
5.
MEGA
would be a massive realignment of Michigan tax policy;
6.
MEGA
would allow a small group of political appointees to determine tax
policy for some of
Michigan's largest corporations;
7.
MEGA
incentives would have to continually increase to be competitive;
8.
MEGA
would make it more difficult to lower overall tax levels;
9.
MEGA
would be difficult to terminate once established;
10.
MEGA
would increase the cost of state government;
11.
MEGA
would require companies to spend thousands of dollars in the
application process, with no guarantee that they will be selected
for an incentive, and it would require them to evaluate locating in
a competing state
It could be argued that the problems with MEGA highlighted more
than 10 years ago by that study have largely come to pass. In their
recent study, titled "MEGA: A Retrospective Assessment," authors
Michael D. LaFaive and Michael J. Hicks, also Mackinac Center for
Public Policy, provide an extensive review of MEGA’s track record
during the past 10 years, noting that MEGA originally projected that
the business firms to which it has offered state tax credits would
create 35,821 jobs at their facilities by 2005, but have produced
only 13,541 — about 38 percent of expectations — instead.
"In
aggregate, the MEGA (tax) credits (to businesses) have been
unsuccessful in improving per-capita income, employment and the
unemployment rate" at either the state or county level in Michigan”.
PREVIOUS COLUMNS
- Well done
is better than well said.
Benjamin
Franklin US author, diplomat, inventor, physicist, politician, &
printer (1706 - 1790)
|